Posted by Meg Bear on April 15, 2008
Special thanks to Ken for getting me to read The Fred Factor which reminds us that each and every day we make an impact, the real question is what kind of impact do we make?
This reminded me of something a good friend said once, I will attempt to paraphrase the story.
I was working for a company that was falling upon hard times. The rule, not the exception really with Valley startups (although we always seem to forget that when we hear of the big winners but I digress). I had the luxury of working with a great team at this company and we were all very sad to know that it had to end. One of the team members asked the other if he was concerned that he might not have another team as fun to work for in his next job. His answer was simple and profound to me, he said “no, I’m planning to bring it with me”.
Wow. Powerful and humbling thing to think about. So I ask you, is your workplace better for having you there?
If not, why not?
Posted in engagement, teams | 2 Comments »
Posted by Meg Bear on December 13, 2007
Back in school (go cats), it was all the rage in the business program to have the majority of our work be team-based. The thinking being, that in a work environment, it is really more about teams then individuals.
Lately, I’ve been reading and thinking about teams and Talent Management. Of course, this has taken me all over the place a bit but I’ll do my best to make a point vs. forcing you all to wonder all over the place like I have been.
One place I ended up was this article on emotional intelligence of teams. To summarize, its not just important for individuals to have emotional intelligence but its also useful for teams (duh!).
This article points to the HBR study that gives three contributing factors to high functioning teams.
Trust among members
A sense of group identity
A sense of group efficacy
Ok, so teams need to trust each other, define themselves in terms of the group and they must feel, that as a team, they have the ability to actually get something done. Again, duh!
Turns out that for some cultures (and for some people) a team dynamic is not just a nice to have. Thanks to Mark for pointing me to this article that suggests that in Asia the team might be the biggest factor in engagement (see, I told you I’d attempt to bring this to a point).
In talking to customers about teams, there are several head scratching elements that HR groups face in trying to build teams that work well together. Why do some teams work well and others not? Is it one person? How do we predict which teams will succeed? and so on.
In my mind, it is for teams that the value of the social network can be brought to real business benefit. I would like to predict that companies that learn to leverage their social networks as both a productivity tool for teams, and as a tool for proactively identifying team members, will find a new competitive advantage for their talent. And, if the insight into Asia is accurate, there might be exponential benefit to this strategy as well.
Posted in engagement, social network, teams | No Comments »