Encourage Job Hopping
Posted by Amy Wilson on February 25, 2008
I am adding some thoughts to Mark and Meg’s posts on talent mobility.
Let’s suppose the following three statements are true:
1) people do better when they change jobs every 2-3 years
2) organizations benefit when people do better
3) managers get more money when organizations benefit
So, why do managers hoard talent? Why do employees feel stuck in their position and the only way out is to leave the company? Why do organizations have a policy of internal mobility, but not a culture of internal mobility?
All of the leading organizations I meet with have a policy in favor of internal mobility. The policy usually says something like “Employees that have been in their positions for one year and have satisfactory performance are eligible to apply for another position.” That’s nice. But, where’s the policy that encourages managers to transfer their employees after they have worked successfully in their current role for 2-3 years?
Few of the leading organizations I meet with have such a policy or even the encouragement of such an idea. That said, those few are doing some very cool things, mostly around emphasizing statement 3 above (more money!): calling out leaders that are “talent producing” and making this a key factor for promotion, tying incentives directly to giving away talent, ensuring that managers will get what they need (resources) to meet their objectives.
Meg Bear said
I was reading something recently that suggested that rotations into HR from the rest of the company was a great way to build “business skills” within the HR community and a great experience for leaders. This kind of focused job mobility has a lot of side benefits.
A Girl’s Guide to Hunting and Farming « TalentedApps said
[…] a tasty pie). There is an important aspect of letting go, though, that I failed to mention in my prior post and that is you now have nothing. You just sold your prized possession … How are you going to […]
Down and out on Wall Street … how can HR benefit? « TalentedApps said
[…] your job req today and brace yourself for the invention of sub-prime talent lending. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Behind Closed Doors – The Talent Review […]
Daniel said
Do all managers really worry about what would good for the company or benefit them and their team?
I think it’s very human thing – after one put so much efforts in hiring the right person, training her and teaching her job nuances, making friends, and so on – normal manager wouldn’t want to losing her employee just because HR said it’s be good for the company.
Daniel Kreg,
Israel Tour Online
Amy Wilson said
Daniel – Thanks for your comment. One of my former colleagues had a similar response and I wrote about it in this post:
Bottom line is that managers need incentives, support and trust to participate in an internal mobility program.
Do you reward your Talent Developers? « TalentedApps said
[…] most effectively, b) other leaders strive to become Talent Developers, and c) talented people seek out opportunities with many […]
When will we get serious about Talent Mobility? « TalentedApps said
[…] been talking about Talent Mobility for awhile. We understand that it increases employee engagement. We understand that it builds […]